Total valproate versus free valproate in therapeutic drug monitoring for bipolar disorder: A cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: The debate about observing total versus free serum valproate levels for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has been unresolved for decades. This study was planned to assess the agreement between the total versus free valproate levels and the advantage of one method over the other in TDM. METHODS: The present cross-sectional study was done on 93 patients with bipolar disorder. The intraclass correlation coefficient, Bland Altman analysis, and Lin's concordance analysis were done to assess the agreement between the total and free valproate concentrations. Linear and polynomial models were constructed to evaluate the relation between the two measurements. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was done to compare the accuracy for differentiating remission from non-remission on Young's mania rating scale (YMRS). RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient were 0.491 (p = .002) and 0.055 (95% CI:0.037, 0.073), respectively. Bland Altman's analysis showed proportional bias. A polynomial model of second order was found to be the best fit for the prediction of free valproate from the data for total valproate, and 81.4% of the variability in free valproate could be explained when adjusted for albumin levels. The area under the curve for total valproate was 0.60 when compared to free valproate 0.56 for differentiating between remission and non-remission, but the comparison between the two ROC analyses was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Free valproate does not provide any added advantage over the total valproate levels; hence, total valproate levels may continue to be used as the marker for drug monitoring.

Efficacy and safety of add-on sodium benzoate, a D-amino acid oxidase inhibitor, in treatment of schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The role of sodium benzoate, an NMDA receptor enhancer, in schizophrenia has been evaluated in a few clinical trials, but results are contradictory and inconclusive. The present meta-analysis has evaluated the efficacy and safety of add-on sodium benzoate for the treatment of schizophrenia. METHODS: After performing a literature search on MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane databases and International Clinical Trial Registry Platform, reviewers assessed eligibility and extracted data from four relevant articles. PRISMA guidelines were followed in the selection, analysis, and reporting of findings. The random-effect model was used to estimate effect size. Quality assessment was done using the risk of bias assessment tool, and sensitivity analysis was done in case of high heterogeneity. RESULTS: Add-on sodium benzoate can improve positive symptoms of schizophrenia significantly (MD: -1.87; 95%CI: -3.25 to -0.48; p = 0.008) but had no significant favourable effect on negative symptoms (p = 0.84), general psychopathology (p = 0.49), and total PANSS score (p = 0.19) over the control. There was no significant improvement in GAF (p = 0.43), CGI (p = 0.58), cognitive function (p = 0.46) and quality of life (p = 0.73). Extrapyramidal symptoms were significantly higher (MD: 0.39; 95% CI:0.19-0.60; p = 0.0002) in the sodium benzoate group in comparison to the control group; however, there was no significant difference in respect to other adverse events. CONCLUSION: Sodium benzoate can improve the positive symptoms of schizophrenia without any beneficial effect on other symptomatology, cognition, quality of life and functioning. Further studies are needed to evaluate long-term efficacy, safety and use in specific subgroups of patients.